Govt10: The surveillance state and society (v1.0)
Key reference is Prof Paul Rosenzweig
of George Washington University.
Living in an Age of Constant Scrutiny
Every day, for good or ill, what you do and what you say is under scrutiny—by friends, coworkers, and family, but also by the U.S. government, foreign governments, and large commercial data collectors. These commercial repositories may be accessed by governments under certain circumstances or sold for profit. Meanwhile, cyber‑attacks increasingly target central stores of personal data held by organizations across the world.
Three major trends are driving the rapid expansion of surveillance capabilities.
1. Proliferation of New Sensor Platforms
Across the globe, new and innovative ways of capturing information have emerged:
License plate readers
Citywide camera systems
Drones
Searchable DNA databases
Apps and websites that capture personal information
Email and social media platforms
Geolocation systems
Fingerprint and facial recognition systems
Other novel data‑collection technologies
2. Increased Power of Data Analytics
Moore’s law has enabled algorithms to analyze immense volumes of data. Today’s systems can correlate billions or trillions of data points, and AI will only accelerate this capability. Cloud computing provides millions of processors, enabling even more complex analytics.
3. Ever‑Decreasing Costs of Data Storage
We are rapidly approaching a world where everything can be digitized and stored permanently.
A Defining Moment for Government, Rights, and Oversight
Technology now outpaces the ability of law and policy to adapt. New surveillance techniques often operate in a legal gray zone. Secrecy requirements make it difficult for citizens to know what their government is doing in their name.
This creates inherent tensions:
Secrecy vs. transparency
Security vs. privacy and civil liberties
Ethical vs. practical considerations
Accountability vs. effectiveness
Limited government vs. effective government
Conflicts arise between executive departments, between branches of government, and through lawsuits brought by individuals. Investigative journalism and organizations like the ACLU also play key roles.
Forms of Surveillance
Surveillance falls into three categories:
Physical
Electronic (signals)
Dataveillance (PII and digital data)
As PII stores have grown, so have efforts—both commercial and governmental—to use them. These stores are also prime targets for cyber thieves.
Examples:
The U.S. used all three forms to locate and eliminate Osama bin Laden.
TSA uses PII from flight reservations to check against the TSDB database (Secure Flights Program), upheld by courts.
Errors in the no‑fly list led to court rulings requiring a process for individuals to clear their names.
Global Approaches to Surveillance
China: Highly pervasive surveillance, widely accepted.
Europe: Strong emphasis on individual rights.
United States: Somewhere in between, with strong focus on oversight and preventing abuses.
Historical abuses uncovered by the Church, Pike, and Rockefeller commissions include programs like MOCKINGBIRD, MINARET, HTLINGUAL, and COINTELPRO. These led to reforms, including requirements for warrants for domestic electronic surveillance.
Post‑9/11 Changes
After 9/11:
The DNI (Director of National Intelligence) was created to coordinate across 17 intelligence agencies.
The NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) was created to connect intelligence and law enforcement.
The PATRIOT Act tore down barriers between intelligence and law enforcement and tightened anti‑money‑laundering rules.
Some provisions became permanent; others lapsed or were struck down. Critics argue the act weakened oversight and expanded surveillance of citizens not suspected of wrongdoing. The Freedom Act of 2015 replaced many Patriot Act provisions and corrected several abuses.
Oversight Mechanisms
Key oversight structures include:
Congressional oversight committees
Senate confirmation of intelligence officials
Congressional control of budgets
Congressional investigative powers
The FISA Act and FISC Court, which authorize surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes
Investigative journalists and civil liberties organizations
The Explosion of Big Data
Modern threats arise from the sheer scale of data collection:
Financial data in corporate databases
Every click, website visit, and purchase
Cell phone geolocation and metadata
Commercial data brokers selling information to governments
Data aggregators hold vast amounts of personal information—birth records, credit histories, real estate transactions, liens, and more. Some companies hold 1,500 data points per adult.
This data can:
Identify new threats
Be misused against political opponents or protesters
Enable highly targeted political campaigns
Systems like ATS (used by Homeland Security) screen incoming passengers and have been effective.
Three Modern Data Categories Requiring New Policy
1. Biometric Data
Includes iris scans, fingerprints, DNA, voice, hand geometry, gait, and facial recognition. These systems require enrollment and accurate databases. Some biometrics—like facial, voice, and gait—can be collected covertly.
DNA matching can identify relatives even if the individual is not in the database. The Supreme Court ruled DNA may be collected after an arrest. Private companies like 23andMe and Ancestry also hold large DNA stores.
2. Geolocation Data
Modern systems can track individuals or objects within 10 feet. Sources include:
GPS trackers
Cell phones (texts, calls, apps)
AirTags and similar devices
Law enforcement requires oversight to use trackers, but voluntarily shared data can be accessed with a subpoena.
3. Internet of Things (IoT)
Communication capabilities now exist in:
Insulin pumps
Cameras
Toasters
Thermostats
Smart meters
Refrigerators
Glucose monitors
Retail tags
These devices are often insecure and generate massive amounts of data. Companies prioritize commercial value over privacy.
Looking Ahead
Quantum computing, human‑computer interfaces, and artificial intelligence will force society to make new decisions about privacy and security. Government will struggle to keep pace.
Oversight in the U.S. is strong, but vulnerabilities remain. A future authoritarian‑leaning president could subvert oversight, restrict information to Congress, or weaponize data against political opponents.
Meanwhile, cybercriminals and rogue states pose an even greater threat if they gain access to U.S. data stores.
My next essay addresses cybercrime and cyber warfare.
Want to Read on?
NEXT: AI assistance for seniors with vision Impairment
Comments