Anti Matter (v1.1)

The Dawn of Antimatter

Antimatter consists of the physical mirror counterparts to normal matter. The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928 with a groundbreaking paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realized that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of "antielectrons." These were officially discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons (positive electrons).

The hunt for other antiparticles took decades. On October 19, 1955, the discovery of the antiproton was announced, earning discoverers Emilio Segrè and Owen Chamberlain the 1959 Nobel Prize in Physics. Just a year later, in 1956, the antineutron was discovered in proton–antiproton collisions at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Bevatron by Bruce Cork, Glen Lambertson, Oreste Piccioni, and William Wenzel.

The Cosmic Imbalance and Volatile Energy

In the early universe—specifically during the quark epoch (10^-12 to 10^-6 seconds after the Big Bang)—there was a roughly equal proportion of matter and antimatter. When matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate one another, converting 100% of their mass into pure energy:

E = mc^{2}

This yields an incomprehensibly large amount of energy—a hundred billion times more than a chemical explosion like TNT, and 10,000 times more than a nuclear weapon. Just 1 gram of antimatter interacting with 1 gram of matter would release energy equivalent to the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki.

During the subsequent hadron epoch, the universe cooled, preventing the formation of new matter or antimatter. Through a process not yet fully understood called baryogenesis, a slight asymmetry left a tiny excess of matter (about one extra matter particle for every billion pairs). This tiny remnant is what formed our entire known universe today.

Antimatter in Modern Medicine: PET Scans

While creating bulk antimatter is notoriously difficult, we actually produce it every day in hospitals using radioactive isotopes that decay via positron emission. Because individual positrons weigh a mere 9.1 times 10^{-28} grams, they are incredibly cheap individually (about 1¢ each), even though a full gram of them would cost a fortune.

Hospitals use these positrons for PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans, an invaluable tool for observing cellular-level body functions. Around two million PET scans are performed annually in the United States to evaluate heart conditions, brain disorders, and cancer treatments (such as radiation, chemo, and immunotherapy).

1. Administration: A radiotracer (like Fluorine-18 or Oxygen-15) is injected into the patient.

2. Emissions: As specific tissues break down the tracer, it emits positrons.

3. Annihilation: These positrons instantly collide with nearby electrons in the patient's body.

4. Imaging: The resulting annihilation produces gamma rays, which the PET scanner detects to map out highly detailed, bright images of internal tissue activity.

The Staggering Cost of Creation

Unlike natural resources, antimatter cannot be mined; it must be meticulously crafted one atom at a time. The simplest antimatter element is antihydrogen, consisting of a single antiproton orbited by a positron.

In 1995, physicists at CERN successfully created the first antihydrogen atoms by colliding antiprotons with xenon atoms. Because antimatter annihilates upon contact with regular container walls, scientists had to develop complex magnetic traps, cooling the antihydrogen to just fractions of a degree above absolute zero to extend its fleeting lifespan.

However, scaling this production is an engineering nightmare. The Large Hadron Collider at CERN spans nearly 17 miles, features over 9,300 superconducting magnets, and requires 120 Megawatts of power—enough to run a substantial city. With an annual operational budget of $1 billion, generating a single gram of antihydrogen is estimated to cost $66 trillion and take roughly 100 billion years.

To date, all the antiprotons ever created at Fermilab’s Tevatron (shut down in 2011) amount to roughly 15 nanograms, while CERN has produced about 1 nanogram.

Conclusion: What is it Good For?

If antihydrogen is so astronomically expensive, takes billions of years to make, and consumes far more energy to produce than it yields, what is its use to mankind?

While popular science fiction frames it as the ultimate bomb or starship fuel, its true value today lies entirely in fundamental science and medicine. It forces us to answer the deepest questions about why our universe exists at all, while its subatomic interactions save thousands of lives daily in hospitals around the world.

Want to Read on?

NEXT: Circa 2023 Astro Physics Discoveries (v1.1)

Go to Main Hub